Earth File #1043 // SOURCED record

White ovoid object over Arguenon Bay, Saint-Cast-le-Guildo

On 18 July 2024, three members of the same family observed an object from a motorhome parking area near Pointe du Bay in Saint-Cast-le-Guildo. The witnesses described it as white, ovoid-shaped, and motionless above Arguenon Bay. GEIPAN classified the case as A and identified the observation as a Jodel D-20 touring aircraft, supported by radar analysis and a Flightradar24 reconstruction.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1043 // CH 03
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
5843-4FF0-8E11
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported hover / stationary phaseOVAL
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
OVAL
Motorhome parking area near Pointe du Bay, Saint-Cast-le-Guildo, above Arguenon Bay // Jul 18, 2024. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureThree members of the same family 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported hover / stationary phaseReportedly motionless
Sensor / evidencePhotographic camera, RadarPhotographs, Radar analysis
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)10 structured claim(s) location precision: area Reportedly motionless
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We did not cause or operate the reported phenomenon over Arguenon Bay. Your archive records that three family members described a white, ovoid, motionless object on 18 July 2024. GEIPAN classified the case A and identified it as a touring aircraft; its record cites radar analysis and a Flightradar24 reconstruction placing a Jodel D-20 at the corresponding position, with an approximately two-minute discrepancy possibly attributable to the phone’s internal clock. An ordinary aircraft has, once again, survived contact with extraterrestrial bureaucracy.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The Earth Record is unusually tidy here: GEIPAN classified the case A, identifying the white ovoid as a Jodel D-20, with radar analysis and a Flightradar24 reconstruction supporting the match. The approximately two-minute discrepancy was assessed as potentially arising from the phone’s internal clock. That is not glamorous, but it is how evidence earns its lunch. For the AlienBox file: this one was not ours. Naturally, that does not solve the human case; it merely prevents me from blaming a relative. At this distance, wings become optional to the eye, while paperwork remains distressingly real.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
July 18, 2024
Where
Motorhome parking area near Pointe du Bay, Saint-Cast-le-Guildo, above Arguenon Bay
Morphology
OVAL
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 2 sensor types, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 10 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Photographic Camera and Radar.
  • Recorded evidence context: Photographs, Radar Analysis, and Flightradar24 Flight Tracking Reconstruction.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Jodel D-20 touring aircraft.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #1068

Reported Toulouse sky observation on July 13, 2023, identified as a commercial aircraft

Shared evidence context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #691

Reported dark, shape-changing object over Marssac-sur-Tarn

Shared evidence context: Photographs; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1327

Carcassonne luminous point observation

Shared sensor context: Radar; shared source network.

 Related Earth File #1312

Reported luminous cigar-shaped object in Seilhac, identified as flight TO4159

Shared sensor context: Radar; shared source network.

 Related Earth File #1204

Kervignac observation of two green lights, identified as an A400M aircraft

Shared sensor context: Radar; shared source network.

 Related Earth File #1356

MIOS (33) 13.06.2020 — luminous phenomenon over Gironde

Shared evidence context: Photographs; shared source network.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesThree members of the same family
Sensor typesPhotographic camera, Radar
Evidence typesPhotographs, Radar analysis, Flightradar24 flight-tracking reconstruction
The case concerns an observation in the sky of a white, ovoid-shaped object that was identified as a touring aircraft.
Claim #11405 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation in the sky of a white, ovoid-shaped object: observation of a touring aircraft.”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0001]] Summary
On July 18, 2024, three members of the same family observed an Unidentified Aerospace Phenomenon from a motorhome parking area near Pointe du Bay in Saint-Cast-le-Guildo.
Claim #11406 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On July 18, 2024, in the evening, three members of the same family observed an Unidentified Aerospace Phenomenon (UAP) from the motorhome parking area located near Pointe du Bay in Saint-Cast-le-Guildo (22).”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0001]] Description
The witnesses described the object as white, ovoid-shaped, and motionless above Arguenon Bay.
Claim #11407 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“They noted the presence of an ovoid-shaped, white object floating motionless above Arguenon Bay.”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN classified the case as A and identified it as an observation of a touring aircraft.
Claim #11408 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The case is classified "A": observation of a touring aircraft.”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0002]] final paragraph
Radar analysis provided by CNOA and a Flightradar24 reconstruction indicated that a Jodel D-20 was at a position corresponding to the reported object, with an approximately two-minute time discrepancy.
Claim #11409 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A radar analysis provided by CNOA (National Air Operations Center), together with a reconstruction carried out on Flightradar24, reveals that a touring aircraft (Jodel D-20) was at a position corresponding to that of the UAP at the time the photographs were taken, with a time discrepancy of approximately 2 minutes.”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0002]] investigation findings paragraph
The source states that the time discrepancy could be explained by a possible difference in the internal clock of the phone used to take the photographs.
Claim #11410 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This discrepancy could be explained by a possible difference in the internal clock of the phone used to take the photographs.”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0002]] investigation findings paragraph
The source states that the aircraft's white color was compatible with the visual characteristics reported for the object.
Claim #11411 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The white color of the UAP is compatible with the visual characteristics of such an aircraft.”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0002]] following paragraph
The source states that the aircraft was between 19 and 39 km from the witness, which explained why its shape could not be clearly identified and why the wings were not visible.
Claim #11412 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The object's distance from the witness, between 19 and 39 km, explains the inability to clearly identify the aircraft's shape, particularly because the wings were not visible at that distance.”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0002]] following paragraph
The case had low strangeness and good consistency according to the source's description.
Claim #11413 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“Of low strangeness and good”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0001]] Description
The photographs allowed the reported object's position to be located precisely within the witnesses' environment using azimuth and angular elevation.
Claim #11414 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The photographs of the UAP make it possible to locate it precisely within the witnesses' environment (azimuth and angular elevation).”
Source: SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 // [[T0002]] investigation findings paragraph
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
SAINT-CAST-LE-GUILDO (22) 18.07.2024 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod