AlienBox does more than collect UFO and UAP records. This desk compares the structured public Earth Archive across witness context, sensor mentions, evidence types, published resolutions, morphology and chronology. The source material remains the evidence layer; the comparisons and research notes below are AlienBox's publisher contribution.
1,023 of 1,023 public dossiers fall into this collection (100.0%). 964 record a published resolution, 271 include structured sensor context, and 221 record multiple witnesses or an explicit plural-witness marker. These are archive characteristics, not evidence grades.
These observations are derived from structured fields in the current public archive. They are intentionally written as archive findings rather than claims about what UFOs or UAPs ultimately are.
964 of 1,023 currently public dossiers include a stored published resolution (94.2%). AlienBox preserves those source conclusions for comparison; the site does not silently turn a source-specific explanation into a universal finding.
271 public dossiers currently carry one or more structured sensor types (26.5%). A sensor field means the source record names instrument context; it does not automatically mean the reported object was independently corroborated.
221 dossiers (21.6%) record either a witness count of two or more or an explicit plural-witness marker. That makes the records useful for comparing observer context while keeping source independence and exact headcounts separate questions.
257 dossiers (25.1%) currently reference photo, image, film, or video evidence in structured fields. AlienBox treats media presence as context and keeps source provenance more important than the existence of an image by itself.
Light is currently the most frequently recorded non-empty morphology among public dossiers in this snapshot (377 records). That may reflect source vocabulary and collection coverage as much as anything about the underlying observations.
2010s is currently the most represented decade in this public snapshot (272 records). This is a coverage observation, not evidence that sightings were objectively more common during that decade.
Each rabbit hole uses an explicit structured filter and publishes its own archive snapshot. The counts describe the current AlienBox dataset, not the prevalence of unexplained phenomena in the real world.
AlienBox is not a statistically representative survey of all anomalous observations. Coverage depends on which archives are public, collectible, legally usable, sufficiently structured, translated, and cleared through the site's evidence rules. Missing records are not negative evidence. A frequent label can reflect source vocabulary or collection bias. An unresolved label means the cited process did not resolve the record within its scope; it does not establish an extraordinary origin.
For that reason, AlienBox publishes the source network, methodology, claim-level citations and contrary/resolution context alongside the more entertaining Fred layer. The useful product is the comparison without the category error.