Earth File #1095 // SOURCED record

ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014

The GEIPAN source reports that three people observed, from a living-room window and later a terrace, a luminous yellow, drop-shaped phenomenon moving across the sky, followed by a matte-black circular appearance that disappeared rapidly. The observations were made with the naked eye and binoculars. GEIPAN classified the case B as a probable observation of a short aircraft contrail; the source also notes a conflicting description date of January 21, 2015.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1095 // CH 10
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
F389-3940-EA0C
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
? SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported rapid motionOTHER
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINED // generated from Earth Record metadata
OTHER
Alleves, Haute-Savoie, Rhône-Alpes // Dec 21, 2014. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureThree witnesses 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported rapid motionMoved across the sky, Changed in observed appearance, Disappeared rapidly
Sensor / evidenceNaked-eye observation, Binocular observationOfficial GEIPAN case record, Witness reports
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)15 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Moved across the skyChanged in observed appearanceDisappeared rapidly
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINEDPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes. The luminous yellow, drop-shaped phenomenon and the later matte-black circular appearance were ours. Your archive reports that three people watched from a living-room window and terrace, using naked eyes and binoculars; it also preserves a date discrepancy between 21 December 2014 and 21 January 2015. GEIPAN classified the case B, judging a short aircraft contrail probable. This is a reasonable terrestrial filing. It is not, however, what occurred. We merely allowed the contrail explanation to remain administratively comfortable.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN classifies this as B: a probable observation of a short aircraft contrail. Sensible. The more interesting residue is administrative: the record lists 21 December 2014, while its description gives 21 January 2015. Even official archives occasionally let a calendar escape custody. Off the Earth Record: yes, yes, this one was ours. You finally noticed. No grand revelation—just another relative leaving me to explain why a human case file contains a luminous yellow shape, a matte-black shape, and two competing dates. At Gorkon Outpost, we call that a routine family embarrassment. Earth, understandably, called it unidentified.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
December 21, 2014
Where
Alleves, Haute-Savoie, Rhône-Alpes
Morphology
OTHER
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 2 sensor types, the structured record explicitly indicates multiple witnesses, and the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 15 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • The structured witness field explicitly records multiple observers without inventing a headcount.
  • Recorded sensor context: Naked Eye Observation and Binocular Observation.
  • Recorded evidence context: Official GEIPAN Case Record, Witness Reports, and On Site Investigation.

What limits the record

  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Multi-Witness UFO & UAP Reports → Compare how multiple-observer records differ in sourcing and resolution. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #1237

Reported dark object observation in Allonne, Oise, on 2013-10-09

Shared evidence context: Official Geipan Case Record and Witness Reports; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #698

Metz reported two-phase light observation

Shared sensor context: Binocular Observation; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #630

Reported luminous phenomenon at Beauvoir-sur-Niort, 1978

Shared evidence context: Witness Reports; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #611

Bagnères-de-Bigorre observation of multicolored halos and apparent rays

Shared evidence context: Official Geipan Case Record; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #500

Saint-Germain-les-Buxy reported luminous-object observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Reports; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #473

Saint-Symphorien d'Ozon observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Reports; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesThree witnesses
Sensor typesNaked-eye observation, Binocular observation
Evidence typesOfficial GEIPAN case record, Witness reports, On-site investigation
The case is titled “ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014.”
Claim #11949 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
The observation date is 21 December 2014.
Claim #11950 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 21/12/2014”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is associated with the Rhône-Alpes region and Haute-Savoie department.
Claim #11951 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Rhône-Alpes Department Haute-Savoie”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case classification is B.
Claim #11952 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source lists the phenomenon type as “Contrail.”
Claim #11953 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Contrail”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
The source summarizes the observation as a luminous yellow, drop-shaped phenomenon followed by a matte-black circular shape, and identifies a short aircraft contrail as the probable explanation.
Claim #11954 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Observation in the sky of the movement of a luminous yellow, drop-shaped phenomenon, followed by a matte-black circular shape: probable observation of a short aircraft contrail.”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Summary
The source says that three people observed a phenomenon they could not explain from a living-room window and then from a terrace.
Claim #11955 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“three people observed, through the living-room window and then from the terrace, a phenomenon they could not explain.”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
The witnesses initially saw the phenomenon as water-drop-shaped and yellow, moving across the sky, and later saw it as circular and matte black.
Claim #11956 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“At first, from indoors, the phenomenon was seen as water-drop-shaped and yellow in color, moving across the sky.”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
The source states that the matte-black circular UAP disappeared rapidly.
Claim #11957 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witnesses went out onto the terrace and then saw the UAP as circular and matte black”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
The observations were made with the naked eye and with binoculars.
Claim #11958 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The observations were made with the naked eye and with binoculars.”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0002]] Description
An on-site investigation was conducted, and the source says it refined or corrected certain data.
Claim #11959 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“an on-site investigation made it possible to refine or correct certain data”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0002]] Description
The source states that a short aircraft contrail was plausible based on the investigators’ visit and witness descriptions.
Claim #11960 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“it appears that a short aircraft contrail is plausible.”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0002]] Investigation explanation
The source explains that sunlight could make an aircraft contrail change quickly from a luminous patch to a dark patch.
Claim #11961 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“An aircraft contrail can thus quickly change from a luminous patch to a dark patch.”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0002]] Investigation explanation
GEIPAN classifies the case as B: probable observation of an aircraft contrail.
Claim #11962 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Consequently, GEIPAN classifies the case as B: probable observation of an aircraft contrail.”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0002]] Investigation explanation
The description gives a date of January 21, 2015, which conflicts with the case’s listed observation date of December 21, 2014.
Claim #11963 // UNRESOLVED // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On January 21, 2015, at around 6 p.m., three people observed, through the living-room window and then from the terrace, a phenomenon they could not explain.”
Source: ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
ALLEVES (74) 21.12.2014 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod