Earth File #1119 // SOURCED record

Pellouailles-les-Vignes orange-red lights observation

At around 1 a.m. on 7 September 2014, several orange-red lights reportedly followed different trajectories while gaining altitude and then went out. GEIPAN classified the case as B, indicating a probable observation of Thai lanterns.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1119 // CH 02
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
D6CF-9E2F-ABB6
NIGHT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENT // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Pellouailles-les-Vignes (49) // Sep 7, 2014 01:00. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED NIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picture Not stated 0 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionfollowed different trajectories, gained altitude, went out
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedvisual observation, official scientific investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness7/9 fields // 78%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)3 structured claim(s) location precision: locality followed different trajectoriesgained altitudewent out
FRED // FIELD ASSESSMENTPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Your record describes several orange-red lights near Pellouailles-les-Vignes at around 1 a.m. on 7 September 2014, following different trajectories, gaining altitude, and going out. GEIPAN classified the case as B: probable Thai lanterns. We do not recognize the reported phenomenon either. This is unusual. Our catalog contains many errors, but usually they are at least errors we can identify. Gorkon Outpost has been notified, though its filing system remains ornamental.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A sourced GEIPAN/CNES record describes orange-red lights rising along different trajectories before going out; GEIPAN classifies the case B, with Thai lanterns as the probable explanation. That is a sensible label, not a cosmic confession. The observation remains a visual report with a partially explained resolution, and “unidentified” does not pay rent in the extraterrestrial category. Off the Earth Record, even we do not recognize this one. It has the general administrative aroma of my cousin Nessa Qel’s errands—three code names, Quasar Foam, and a borrowed component returned to the wrong machine—but no, I am not assigning her this file. Her plans are inefficient, not invisible. For once, the lantern explanation gets to sit in the correct box.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2014-09-07 01:00:00
Where
Pellouailles-les-Vignes (49)
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 3 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Visual Observation and Official Scientific Investigation.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Probable Thai lanterns.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesNot stated
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesvisual observation, official scientific investigation
The observation occurred at around 1 a.m. and involved orange-red lights following different trajectories as they gained altitude and then went out.
Claim #12175 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“At around 1 a.m., the witness observed orange-red lights following different trajectories as they gained altitude, then going out.”
Source: PELLOUAILLES-LES-VIGNES (49) 07.09.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details, Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as B, meaning a probable observation of Thai lanterns.
Claim #12179 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as “B”: probable observation of Thai lanterns.”
Source: PELLOUAILLES-LES-VIGNES (49) 07.09.2014 // [[T0002]] Description
The case record lists the phenomenon type as Thai lantern.
Claim #12180 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Thai lantern”
Source: PELLOUAILLES-LES-VIGNES (49) 07.09.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
PELLOUAILLES-LES-VIGNES (49) 07.09.2014 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.