Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, official GEIPAN investigation, no photograph
The observation date was 22 August 2014.
Claim #12245 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Observation date
22/08/2014”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified B.
Claim #12246 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Classification
B”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
GEIPAN summarizes the observation as silent movements of a luminous phenomenon in a cloudy sky and describes it as a probable observation of lasers striking the low cloud layer.
Claim #12247 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Brief observation of the silent movements of a luminous phenomenon in a cloudy sky: probable observation of a set of lasers striking the low cloud layer.”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0001]] Summary
At around 1:10 a.m. on 22 August 2014, a witness reported seeing for a few seconds directly overhead a metallic-colored disk surrounded by small reddish-pink luminous beams.
Claim #12248 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“On 22 August 2014 at around 1:10 a.m., a witness was surprised to hear two cries in the night. Approaching a roof window, he saw, for a few seconds directly overhead, a metallic-colored disk surrounded by small reddish-pink luminous beams.”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness followed the phenomenon's silent movements in the cloudy sky for approximately 20 seconds in total.
Claim #12249 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“The witness followed the phenomenon's silent movements in the cloudy sky for approximately 20 seconds in total.”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
No other testimony was collected, and the testimony was described as precise but provided by a single witness without a photograph.
Claim #12250 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“No other testimony was collected. This testimony is of good consistency: precise, but provided by a single witness and without a photograph.”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The investigation identified the UAP's circular shape, beams, very high speed, a cloud ceiling, and absence of noise as objective elements.
Claim #12251 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Circular shape of the UAP - Presence of beams - Very high speed - Presence of a cloud ceiling - Absence of noise”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
GEIPAN concludes that the observation was probably a set of “Skytrackers”-style lasers moving rapidly and projected onto the base of the low cloud layer.
Claim #12252 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“We can conclude that the observation made by the witness was probably a set of “Skytrackers”-style lasers, moving rapidly and projected onto the base of the low cloud layer.”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
GEIPAN states that the observation was not very strange because the objects' behavior was ultimately ordinary.
Claim #12253 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“The observation is not very strange because these were objects whose behavior was ultimately ordinary.”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
The case is classified as B as a probable observation of a set of lasers striking the low cloud layer.
Claim #12254 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“This case is classified as “B” as a probable observation of a set of lasers striking the low cloud layer.”
Source: AUTUN (71) 22.08.2014
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
