The GEIPAN source reports an observation on 20 August 2014 of approximately twelve reddish-orange lights arranged geometrically in a trapezoidal formation with a right triangle at one end. The lights reportedly moved and went out one by one; several people reportedly saw the same display, although only one testimony was collected. GEIPAN classified the case as B and identified the phenomenon as Thai lanterns, citing compatibility with the reported color, sequential extinguishing, and wind direction.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 1129 // CH 07 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT 0C2B-9BC5-1937 CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
Reported motionOTHER
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINED // generated from Earth Record metadata
OTHER
Saint-Georges-de-Pointindoux, Pays de la Loire, Vendée // Aug 20, 2014. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINEDCLOCK // NOT PRECISEGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureSeveral people reportedly observed the display, One testimony was collected 3 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionMoved in a direction compatible with the reported wind, Went out one by one
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness testimony, Official GEIPAN investigation record
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s)location precision: localityMoved in a direction compatible with the reported windWent out one by one
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINEDAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes, that arrangement was ours. We were testing a compact formation protocol over Saint-Georges-de-Pointindoux on 20 August 2014, including the sequential shutdown. Your GEIPAN record reports approximately twelve reddish-orange lights, several people reportedly observing them, and only one testimony being collected. GEIPAN classified the case B and identified Thai lanterns, citing color, extinguishing pattern, and wind compatibility. A reasonable assessment. We have no objection to the paperwork.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record classifies this as B—Thai lanterns—with the color, sequential extinguishing, and wind-compatible movement doing most of the explanatory work. Sensible. The account’s consistency was assessed as low, too, which is an elegant way of saying the paperwork declined to carry its share of the mystery.
Off the Earth Record: yes, yes, the Visitors are taking responsibility. You finally noticed us. Please do not confuse that admission with independent Earth evidence; the human file remains exactly what it is—a well-supported lantern explanation, not a confirmed extraterrestrial event. I have filed the distinction twice already, and someone from the Haluke System keeps stamping “dramatic” on the wrong box.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Quasar Foam
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
August 20, 2014
Where
Saint-Georges-de-Pointindoux, Pays de la Loire, Vendée
Morphology
OTHER
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
8 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony and Official GEIPAN Investigation Record.
The source record includes a published resolution: Thai lanterns, according to GEIPAN.
What limits the record
No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
“a witness in a field who is preparing to put away his drone sees an arrangement of 12 reddish-orange lights in the night sky. The geometrically arranged lights form a trapezoidal shape while moving and then go out one by one.”
The witnesses described about a dozen reddish-orange-vermilion lights arranged geometrically in a form resembling a trapezoid with a right triangle at its right end.
“consisting of about a dozen (as estimated by the witnesses) reddish-orange-vermilion lights “arranged geometrically, forming a sort of trapezoid with a right triangle at its right end.””
GEIPAN states that the reddish-orange color and successive extinguishing are characteristic of lanterns, and that the reconstructed movement is compatible with the measured wind direction.
“The reddish-orange color and their successive extinguishing are also characteristic. The description does not explicitly give the direction of movement, but the witnesses’ route as they followed the UAP makes it possible to reconstruct it. It is compatible with the wind direction (N 0) measured 10 km away.”
GEIPAN assesses the testimony's consistency as low because there was neither a gendarmerie investigation nor a GEIPAN questionnaire, and because the account combines direct and reported testimony.
“The consistency of the testimony is low. We have neither a gendarmerie investigation nor a GEIPAN questionnaire, which results in particular in the absence of a record of the direction of movement.”
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
