Earth File #1149 // SOURCED record

Argelès-sur-Mer dark disk observation

On July 13, 2014, at approximately 3:15 p.m., three members of the same family observed a blurry dark disk from the beach at Argelès-sur-Mer. The reported object moved through cloudy skies for approximately 3 to 4 minutes, without a noticed trail or noise, and disappeared while moving toward land. GEIPAN classified the case as category B and proposed that it was probably an airship or free balloon, while noting that formal evidence was unavailable.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1149 // CH 04
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
E38D-31C7-331F
DAYLIGHT
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionDISK
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINED // generated from Earth Record metadata
DISK
beach at Argelès-sur-Mer // Jul 13, 2014 15:15. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED DAYLIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturethree family members 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoved through cloudy skies, no trail noticed, no noise noticed
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness testimony, official scientific investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: locality moved through cloudy skiesno trail noticedno noise noticed
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINEDPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Your archive records that, on 13 July 2014, three family members at Argelès-sur-Mer observed a blurry dark disk moving through cloudy skies for roughly three to four minutes. No trail or noise was noticed, and it disappeared toward land. GEIPAN classified the case as category B, proposing a probable airship or free balloon while noting that formal evidence was unavailable. We were present as observers only. We did not cause the phenomenon. The paperwork remains admirably inconclusive.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A sourced GEIPAN record describes a three- to four-minute observation of a blurry dark disk and classifies it as category B, with a probable airship or free balloon proposed—but formal evidence unavailable. That is the correct level of confidence: an orderly report, a plausible explanation, and no license to promote “unidentified” into “extraterrestrial.” The Visitors were observers only, in AlienBox lore; they did not cause or identify the phenomenon. Off the Earth Record, family friend Brikk Tor once made one extra low-orbit pass after a few Red Dwarf Stouts and discovered why that phrase appears in so many incident reports. He insists the landing was technically controlled. This file, mercifully, does not require me to arbitrate that claim.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2014-07-13 15:15:00
Where
beach at Argelès-sur-Mer
Morphology
DISK
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony, Official Scientific Investigation, and Investigative Assessment.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN proposed a probable airship or free balloon, including an advertising or surveillance airship or an amateur balloon; formal....

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #650

Reported rapidly moving white disk over Sacy-le-Petit

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #573

NICE (06) — stationary luminous object observation

Shared evidence context: Official Scientific Investigation; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #544

Mirebeau three luminous disks observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1164

White saucer-shaped phenomenon near Royan

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony and Official Scientific Investigation; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1142

Reported black disk observation near Jablines

Shared evidence context: Official Scientific Investigation; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1128

AUTUN (71): reported metallic-colored disk with reddish-pink beams

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesthree family members
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, official scientific investigation, investigative assessment
The case concerns an observation on July 13, 2014, at approximately 3:15 p.m. by three people from the same family on the beach at Argelès-Sur-Mer.
Claim #12453 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On July 13, 2014, at around 3:15 p.m., three people from the same family on the beach at Argelès-Sur-Mer (66) were intrigued by the passage of a blurry dark disk moving through the cloudy sky.”
Source: ARGELES-SUR-MER (66) 13.07.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
The reported object was a blurry dark disk that moved through cloudy skies; no trail or noise was noticed, the observation lasted 3 to 4 minutes, and the object disappeared while moving toward land.
Claim #12454 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“No trail and no noise were noticed during the observation, which lasted 3 to 4 minutes. The Pan disappeared as it moved away toward the land.”
Source: ARGELES-SUR-MER (66) 13.07.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN recorded the phenomenon type as Airship.
Claim #12455 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Airship”
Source: ARGELES-SUR-MER (66) 13.07.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details
GEIPAN classified the case as category B.
Claim #12456 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“In conclusion, GEIPAN classifies this case in category B as a probable observation of an airship or free balloon (advertising or surveillance airship, or amateur balloon).”
Source: ARGELES-SUR-MER (66) 13.07.2014 // [[T0002]] Summary and investigation conclusions
The investigation assessed the testimony as reliable and considered the case fully consistent with a consistency score of 0.8.
Claim #12457 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is therefore fully consistent (0.8).”
Source: ARGELES-SUR-MER (66) 13.07.2014 // [[T0002]] Summary and investigation conclusions
The investigation stated that plausible explanatory proposals could be provided but that formal evidence was not available.
Claim #12458 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Hypotheses: plausible explanatory proposals could be provided, but we were not able to provide formal evidence.”
Source: ARGELES-SUR-MER (66) 13.07.2014 // [[T0002]] Summary and investigation conclusions
GEIPAN proposed that the observation was probably an airship or free balloon, including an advertising or surveillance airship or an amateur balloon.
Claim #12459 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case in category B as a probable observation of an airship or free balloon (advertising or surveillance airship, or amateur balloon).”
Source: ARGELES-SUR-MER (66) 13.07.2014 // [[T0002]] Summary and investigation conclusions
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
ARGELES-SUR-MER (66) 13.07.2014 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod