Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesdriver/witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness report, official scientific investigation, weather report
The case observation date was 23 June 2014.
Claim #12554 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
23/06/2014”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is located in the Île-de-France region and the department of Paris.
Claim #12555 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region
Île-de-France
Department
Paris”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case classification is C.
Claim #12556 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
C”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
The phenomenon type is listed as lack of reliable information.
Claim #12557 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
Lack of reliable information”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
The summary describes several orange lights in the sky followed by their rapid disappearance.
Claim #12558 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Very brief observation of several orange lights in the sky, followed by their rapid disappearance: lack of information.”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Summary
The description says the static orange lights observed at 10:45 p.m. suggest Thai lanterns seen along the direction of the wind.
Claim #12559 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“This testimony concerning static orange lights in the sky at 10:45 p.m. suggests Thai lanterns seen along the direction of the wind.”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The weather report indicated a northerly wind of 15 to 30 km/h.
Claim #12560 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The weather report does indeed indicate a northerly wind of 15 to 30 km/h: Weather.”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The other flying object joining the group of luminous points was also moving with the wind.
Claim #12561 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 94% extraction confidence
“The other flying object joining this group of luminous points is also moving with the wind.”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The source states that the other object may have been another lantern launched after the first group.
Claim #12562 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“It may have been another lantern, launched after the first group.”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness observed the other object through the windshield of a car while driving, and the observation lasted approximately 5 seconds.
Claim #12563 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“the witness observed it through the windshield of his car while driving, and that the observation was very brief (5 s).”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN states that the case's strangeness was not established and its evidential strength was very low because of poor observation conditions and the absence of other testimonies.
Claim #12564 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“the strangeness of the case has not been established, and its evidential strength is very low”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0002]] Description
The case is classified C for lack of information and corroboration.
Claim #12565 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is classified "C": lack of information and corroboration.”
Source: PARIS (75) 23.06.2014
// [[T0002]] Description
