Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesone reporting witness, three accompanying family members
Sensor typesaircraft-tracking data from ADSB-Exchange and ADS-B.NL
Evidence typeswitness account, GEIPAN investigation, aircraft-tracking data, no photographs or videos
The case record identifies the observation date as February 26, 2023.
Claim #12899 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Date of observation
26/02/2023”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified as A.
Claim #12900 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Classification
A”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0001]] Case details
The observation involved two very close white points of light moving slowly at very low altitude, seen from a vehicle and at several locations.
Claim #12901 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observations from a vehicle and at several locations of a UAP consisting of two very close white points of light moving slowly at very low altitude in the sky: observation of the position lights of an A400M-type aircraft during an exercise.”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0001]] Summary
On February 26, 2023, at around 8:00 p.m., one witness observed the UAP from a car traveling between Rebigue and Pechabou while three other family members were present.
Claim #12902 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On February 26, 2023, at around 8:00 p.m., the witness (T1), in the presence of three other family members, observed from a car traveling between Rebigue (31) and Pechabou (31) a UAP consisting of two very close white points of light moving very slowly across the sky.”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0001]] Description
The observation lasted five minutes, including a three-minute interruption when the UAP was obscured by the surroundings.
Claim #12903 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted 5 minutes, including a 3-minute interruption during which the UAP was obscured by”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0001]] Description
Only one of the four people present formalized an account with GEIPAN, and no photographs or videos were provided.
Claim #12904 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Although four people were present during the observation, only one witness formalized their account with GEIPAN, without providing photographs or videos.”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0002]] Case assessment
Analysis of ADSB-Exchange and ADS-B.NL data confirmed the presence of an A400M in the area at low altitude during a large-scale military exercise.
Claim #12907 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Analysis of data from specialized platforms (ADSB-Exchange and ADS-B.NL) confirms the presence”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0002]] Aircraft hypothesis
The source states that the aircraft's transponder was switched off and its lighting signals were reduced, which explained the atypical perception of the aircraft.
Claim #12908 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The transitional flight configuration—transponder switched off and reduced lighting signals ("stealth mode")—explains the atypical perception of the aircraft.”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0003]] Aircraft hypothesis
The source reports a high correlation between the A400M hypothesis and the reported characteristics of the UAP, while noting greater uncertainty for the final observation phase because radar data was absent and another aircraft was approaching Toulouse-Blagnac Airport.
Claim #12909 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The hypothesis of the passage of an A400M-type aircraft shows a strong correlation with the reported characteristics of the UAP:”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0002]] Aircraft hypothesis
GEIPAN classifies the case as A and identifies the observation as an A400M-type aircraft.
Claim #12910 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“At the end of this investigation, GEIPAN classifies the case as "A": observation of an A400M-type aircraft.”
Source: [D95B] FROM REBIGUE (31) TO PECHABOU (31) 26.02.2023
// [[T0003]] Investigation conclusion