Earth File #124 // SOURCED record

Reported red light and motionless form near a window in Duppigheim

GEIPAN records a reported spring 2000 nighttime observation by a 13-year-old adolescent: a red light appeared on an interior living-room wall, seemingly from outside, and a motionless form was reportedly seen behind a windowpane for a few seconds before disappearing instantaneously. GEIPAN classifies the case C, indicating lack of information, and states that no UAP is described; the report may instead concern one or more lights on the ground or a wall.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0124 // CH 01
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
2051-A78C-9D91
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported hover / stationary phaseLIGHT
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Duppigheim, Bas-Rhin, Alsace // 2000. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness, 13-year-old adolescent 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported hover / stationary phasemotionless, disappeared instantaneously, observed for a few seconds
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedtestimony
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)10 structured claim(s) location precision: locality motionlessdisappeared instantaneouslyobserved for a few seconds
FRED // QUICK TAKEShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
This one was ours. Your archive reports that, in spring 2000 at Duppigheim, a 13-year-old witness saw a red light on an interior wall and later reported a motionless form behind a windowpane for a few seconds before it vanished. GEIPAN classified the case C, noting insufficient information and no described UAP; its record allows for lights on the ground or wall instead. Entirely reasonable. We had not submitted the appropriate form to the French filing system.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record is appropriately classified C: one testimony, imprecise timing, and no UAP actually described. The red light and motionless form are worth preserving as reported observations, but the record itself leaves open the far less glamorous possibility of lights on the ground or wall. That is not a failure of imagination; it is what “lack of information” looks like before someone decorates it with certainty. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. Please note that this is an AlienBox lore admission, not a conclusion established by the Earth file. Naturally, I am now expected to file their confession under “insufficient data.”
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Gorkon Blue

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY GORKON BLUE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2000
Where
Duppigheim, Bas-Rhin, Alsace
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 10 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Testimony.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN states that the testimony cannot be linked to a UAP because no UAP is described; it may concern one or more lights on the g....

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #1206

Meteor observation near Les Petites-Loges on 8 November 2022

Shared evidence context: Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1189

Reported luminous points over Clonas-sur-Vareze

Shared evidence context: Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1181

Le Pontet (84) — reported green lights, 8 April 2014

Shared evidence context: Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #870

Saint-Pabu luminous point observation

Shared evidence context: Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #854

Saint-Thibéry blinking star-like observation

Shared evidence context: Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #831

Vienne-en-Val luminous-point observation — 6 September 2015

Shared evidence context: Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness, 13-year-old adolescent
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typestestimony
The case is classified as C, meaning lack of information.
Claim #1602 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification C”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case concerns a fleeting nighttime observation of a motionless form reflected on an interior wall that disappeared instantaneously.
Claim #1603 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Fleeting nighttime observation of a motionless form reflected on an interior wall; instantaneous disappearance: lack of information.”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0001]] Summary
The observation occurred in spring 2000, but no day, month, or time was specified.
Claim #1604 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Testimony of an observation made in spring 2000 (with no day, month, or time specified: arbitrary date of 05/01/2000) and collected in 2008.”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0001]] Description
A 13-year-old adolescent reported seeing a red light on the living-room wall that seemed to come from outside.
Claim #1605 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“One evening in spring 2000, a 13-year-old adolescent observed a red light on the living-room wall that seemed to come from outside.”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0001]] Description
The witness reported seeing a motionless form behind a windowpane for a few seconds before it disappeared instantaneously.
Claim #1606 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness then saw, for a few seconds behind a windowpane, a motionless form that disappeared instantaneously.”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0001]] Description
A single testimony was collected, and it was collected in 2008.
Claim #1607 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A single testimony was collected.”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN states that the testimony cannot be used because it does not describe a UAP and may instead concern one or more lights on the ground or on a wall.
Claim #1608 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This is testimony that cannot be used by GEIPAN.”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN states that there is no possibility of linking the reported observation to a UAP because no UAP is described.
Claim #1609 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“with no possibility of linking them to a UAP because no UAP is described.”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0002]] Description
The report was made 8 or 9 years after the observation and lacked a precise date.
Claim #1610 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“All of this was reported 8 or 9 years later, without a precise date.”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0002]] Description
The case record lists the region as Alsace and the department as Bas-Rhin.
Claim #1612 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Alsace Department Bas-Rhin”
Source: DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 // [[T0001]] Case details
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
DUPPIGHEIM (67) --.--.2000 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod