Earth File #1289 // SOURCED record

Luminous point reported in photographs between Gan and Sévignacq-Meyracq

On March 2, 2022, a witness traveling by car between Gan and Sévignacq-Meyracq photographed the sky and later noticed a luminous point in different photographs. The witness did not see a UAP at the time. GEIPAN classified the case as category A, identifying the observation as a photographic artifact caused by internal stray light from the Sun, also known as a ghost image.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1289 // CH 11
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
1FDC-5EF9-8DCE
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Between Gan and Sévignacq-Meyracq // Mar 2, 2022. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureDriver/photographer 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionAppeared in different places in the photographs, Appeared symmetrically opposite the Sun relative to the camera's optical center
Sensor / evidenceCameraPhotographs
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: area Appeared in different places in the photographsAppeared symmetrically opposite the Sun relative to the camera's optical center
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We accept responsibility for the luminous point. Not for appearing in the sky, obviously; that would have required being there, and we had already reduced our profile to an internal optical reflection. The witness, traveling between Gan and Sévignacq-Meyracq on March 2, 2022, did not see a UAP at the time. GEIPAN classified the case as A and identified a solar stray-light effect—a ghost image. Their paperwork is correct. Irritatingly so.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN classified this case as A: a photographic artifact—internal stray light producing a “ghost image.” The point appeared in different positions because it tracked the camera’s optical geometry, not because the record established an object moving through the sky. A gratifying occasion when the label on the box matches the contents. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility anyway. This was Brikk Tor, a Dremulan family friend, borrowing a survey skiff for “one quick pass.” He returned it with atmospheric dust in the intake and three Gorkon Blues I did not authorize, while insisting the landing was technically controlled. It was, technically. That has never been the same thing as sensible.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
March 2, 2022
Where
Between Gan and Sévignacq-Meyracq
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Camera.
  • Recorded evidence context: Photographs.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Internal stray-light effect caused by the strong solar signal; a photographic ghost image.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #1328

Gondecourt luminous-point observation — 6 June 2021

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Photographs.

 Related Earth File #1126

Saint-Sulpice (81) — two orange lights, 27 August 2014

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Photographs.

 Related Earth File #1171

Mandelieu-la-Napoule orange-red object observation

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Photographs.

 Related Earth File #1163

Angers (49): Two orange luminous phenomena photographed

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Photographs.

 Related Earth File #766

Saint-Christol luminous sky phenomenon, probably a drone — 4 January 2017

Shared sensor context: Camera; shared evidence context: Photographs.

 Related Earth File #1335

Reported colored luminous point observations near Thaon-les-Vosges (24–30 March 2021)

Shared sensor context: Camera; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesDriver/photographer
Sensor typesCamera
Evidence typesPhotographs
The case observation date was March 2, 2022.
Claim #13797 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 02/03/2022”
Source: [D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case was classified as A.
Claim #13798 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification A”
Source: [D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 // [[T0001]] Case details
The listed type of phenomenon was a photographic artifact involving the Sun.
Claim #13799 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Photographic artifact (sun)”
Source: [D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 // [[T0001]] Case details
The witness traveled by car between Gan and Sévignacq-Meyracq, stopped to photograph the sky and clouds, and did not see a UAP at the time.
Claim #13800 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On March 2, 2022, the witness, traveling by car between Gan (64) and Sévignacq-Meyracq (64), decided to stop to take some photographs of the sky and clouds, without seeing a UAP.”
Source: [D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 // [[T0001]] Description
The Sun was present in the field of each photograph, and the witness later noticed a luminous point in different places in the photographs.
Claim #13801 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The Sun is present in the field of each photograph. When she returned home, she noticed the presence in these photos of a luminous point located in different places.”
Source: [D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN identified the phenomenon as a common internal stray-light effect in the camera caused by the strong solar signal.
Claim #13802 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This is a fairly common phenomenon involving the observation of an internal stray-light effect in the camera.”
Source: [D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 // [[T0002]] Explanation
GEIPAN stated that the phenomenon appears symmetrically opposite the Sun relative to the camera's optical center.
Claim #13803 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The phenomenon appears symmetrically opposite the Sun with respect to the camera's optical center.”
Source: [D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 // [[T0002]] Explanation
GEIPAN stated that the optical phenomenon is called a “ghost” or “ghost image” and is a stray image created by stray reflection in the optical system.
Claim #13804 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“In optics, this phenomenon is called a “ghost” or “ghost image.” It is a “stray image” created by stray reflection in the optical system.”
Source: [D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 // [[T0002]] Explanation
GEIPAN classifies the case as A: photographic artifact.
Claim #13805 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies the case as A: photographic artifact.”
Source: [D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 // [[T0002]] Conclusion
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
[D934] FROM GAN (64) TO SEVIGNACQ-MEYRACQ (64) 02.03.2022 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod