Earth File #1322 // SOURCED record

Reported triangular-object observation in Picardy/Oise

GEIPAN records a reported observation on 2013-08-09 of a light-gray triangular object moving northeast to southwest at low altitude without noise while people were watching shooting stars. The case had one eyewitness, no photographic or video evidence, and was classified C because of insufficient information; the testimony was described as imprecise and lacking essential data.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1322 // CH 10
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
9FDB-1948-8966
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionTRIANGLE
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINED // generated from Earth Record metadata
TRIANGLE
Picardy region, Oise department // Aug 9, 2013. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureeyewitness testimony 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoving northeast to southwest, no reported noise
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedeyewitness testimony, no photographic or video documents
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: area moving northeast to southwestno reported noise
FRED // RECEIPT RETAINEDShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes, this one was ours. The GEIPAN record reports a light-gray triangular object moving northeast to southwest at low altitude without reported noise on 9 August 2013 in the Picardy/Oise area. The same record says the case had one eyewitness, no photographic or video documents, and insufficient information for a meaningful assessment; it was therefore classified C. Accurate enough. Not detailed enough. Human paperwork remains undefeated.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
This is a SOURCED Earth Record, and GEIPAN’s conclusion is admirably unromantic: classification C, because the testimony is imprecise and essential information is missing. The paperwork also manages to mention several people watching the sky while identifying only one eyewitness—an ambiguity best filed under “please complete the form.” A triangular, silent object may sound intriguing; the record does not establish what it was. Off the Earth Record: yes, yes. You finally noticed us. The Visitors are taking responsibility, though I should stress that this is AlienBox lore, not evidence from Picardy. I have already sent the relatives a reminder that “unidentified” is not a synonym for “please make Fred explain your weekend.”
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Sublight Lager

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY SUBLIGHT LAGER // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
August 9, 2013
Where
Picardy region, Oise department
Morphology
TRIANGLE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Eyewitness Testimony and No Photographic Or Video Documents.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classification C due to lack of information.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #754

Caumont-sur-Durance luminous-points observation

Shared evidence context: Eyewitness Testimony; similar witness context: Eyewitness Testimony.

 Related Earth File #729

D58 observation from Reignac-sur-Indre to Manthelan: three orange lights

Shared evidence context: No Photographic Or Video Documents; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1192

Wasquehal, France-area expressway observation of three orange luminous forms

Same recorded morphology; shared source network.

 Related Earth File #1121

Reported red bell-shaped object observation in Le Cannet

Shared evidence context: Eyewitness Testimony; shared source network.

 Related Earth File #1107

Orléans (45) — three red spheres forming a triangle

Same recorded morphology; shared source network.

 Related Earth File #1100

Mouans-Sartoux observation of three lights

Same recorded morphology; shared source network.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeseyewitness testimony
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeseyewitness testimony, no photographic or video documents
The case observation date is 2013-08-09.
Claim #14105 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“09/08/2013”
Source: COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details, Observation date
The case is associated with the Picardy region and Oise department.
Claim #14106 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Picardy Department Oise”
Source: COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified as C.
Claim #14107 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification C”
Source: COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
The phenomenon type is listed as “Lack of reliable information.”
Claim #14108 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Lack of reliable information”
Source: COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 // [[T0001]] Case details
Several people reportedly saw a light-gray triangular object moving northeast to southwest at low altitude without making any noise while watching shooting stars.
Claim #14109 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“On August 9, 2013, at midnight, several people were watching shooting stars and were surprised to see a light-gray triangular object moving NE-SW at low altitude and without making any noise.”
Source: COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
Only one brief testimony was collected, and the testimony was described as having very low consistency, being imprecise and lacking detail, and missing essential data for continuing the study.
Claim #14110 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“This testimony has very low consistency: it is imprecise and lacking in detail, and is also missing essential and necessary data for the continuation of the study.”
Source: COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
The case had one eyewitness and no photographic or video documents.
Claim #14111 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“There is only one eyewitness, with no photographic or video documents.”
Source: COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN states that the observation could be moderately strange, but that inaccuracies and gaps prevent a valid assessment of its strangeness.
Claim #14112 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The observation could be moderately strange; however, too many inaccuracies and gaps in the testimony”
Source: COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as C because of lack of information.
Claim #14113 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as C due to lack of information.”
Source: COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 // [[T0002]] Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
COMPIÈGNE (60) 09.08.2013 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod