Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typeswitness
Sensor typescamera, weather station
Evidence typeswitness report, photographs, wind data, official scientific investigation
The case concerns an observation in Gondecourt on 2021-06-06.
Claim #14154 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case is classified A.
Claim #14155 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
A”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0001]] Case details
The listed phenomenon type is Mylar balloon.
Claim #14156 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type
Mylar balloon”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0001]] Case details
The witness reported seeing a luminous point very high in the sky moving slowly from northwest toward west, with straight movements despite U-turns.
Claim #14157 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On June 6 at 10:56 a.m., the witness spotted a luminous point very high in the sky. It moved slowly from the northwest toward the west, and its movements were straight despite U-turns, as if it were being carried by the wind at altitude.”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0001]] Summary
The witness photographed the observation and reported that the object looked different in each photograph and reflected sunlight from its surface.
Claim #14158 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness took photographs of the observation and noted that the object was quite different in each of the photographs, and that the sun was reflected on its surface, meaning that “it was definitely material.””
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0001]] Summary
GEIPAN assessed the testimony as having average strangeness and very good consistency.
Claim #14159 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“of average strangeness and very good consistency (single testimony but a complete testimony with photographs of the UAP).”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0002]] Assessment
GEIPAN stated that the photographs and descriptions strongly suggested an object with a metallized surface of the party-balloon type carried by the wind.
Claim #14160 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The visual appearance of the UAP in the photographs and the descriptions “the sun reflected on its surface, so it was definitely material” and “It was slow and its movements were straight despite its U-turns, as if it were being carried by the wind at altitude” very strongly suggest an object with a metallized surface, of the party-balloon type, carried by t…”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0002]] Analysis
According to the Google Earth excerpt sent by the witness, the UAP moved from azimuth 348° (NNW) to azimuth 235° (WSW), corresponding to movement oriented at 23°.
Claim #14161 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“According to the Google Earth excerpt sent by the witness (not published for reasons of confidentiality regarding the witness’s observation location), the UAP moved from azimuth 348° (NNW) to azimuth 235° (WSW), corresponding to movement oriented at 23°.”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0002]] Analysis
The Lesquin weather station reported wind from 20° at 11 km/h, with gusts of 18 km/h, at the time of the observation.
Claim #14162 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The Lesquin weather station, located 9 km from the witness, reported wind from 20° at a speed of 11 km/h, with gusts of 18 km/h, at the time of the observation (see attached document).”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0002]] Analysis
GEIPAN assessed the UAP trajectory as entirely consistent with the wind and explained the U-turns as possible local variations in wind direction caused by gusts.
Claim #14163 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The trajectory of the UAP is therefore entirely consistent with that of the wind. The U-turns can be explained by local variations in wind direction, given the strength of the gusts at 18 km/h.”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0002]] Analysis
GEIPAN concluded that the observation was very probably of an object carried by the wind of the party-balloon type.
Claim #14164 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN therefore concludes that this was a very probable observation of an object carried by the wind, of the party-balloon type.”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0002]] Conclusion
GEIPAN collected no other testimony for the case.
Claim #14165 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“No other testimony will be collected by GEIPAN.”
Source: GONDECOURT (59) 06.06.2021
// [[T0001]] Summary