Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle resident witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typessingle-witness testimony, no photographs or video
The case observation date was 14 July 2020.
Claim #14396 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“14/07/2020”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0001]] Case details, Observation date
The case was listed in the Rhône-Alpes region and Isère department.
Claim #14397 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region
Rhône-Alpes
Department
Isère”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0001]] Case details
GEIPAN classified the case as A.
Claim #14398 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
A”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0001]] Case details
A resident of Chatte observed an object for several dozen seconds on 14 July 2020 at 6:55 p.m.
Claim #14399 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On July 14, 2020, at 6:55 p.m., a resident of Chatte (38) observed for several dozen seconds an object”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0001]] Description
The observed object was described as triangular, white, fast-moving from northeast to southwest, at high altitude and constant speed.
Claim #14400 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“an object of triangular shape and white color moving rapidly from northeast to southwest, at a high altitude and at a constant speed.”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0001]] Description
The testimony came from a single witness and had no photographs or videos of the UAP, resulting in an average consistency level under GEIPAN criteria.
Claim #14401 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“it comes from a single witness and has neither photographs nor videos of the UAP”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0002]] Summary
GEIPAN's analysis identified aviation as the only plausible hypothesis.
Claim #14402 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The analysis demonstrated that the only plausible hypothesis is aviation-related”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0002]] Summary
FlightRadar 24 data showed that an A320 was flying over Chatte at a time corresponding to the observation, with a similar trajectory.
Claim #14403 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“an A320 aircraft was flying over Chatte (38) at a time corresponding to the observation, with a trajectory similar to the one described.”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0002]] Summary
The analysis concluded that the aircraft was in its cruising phase and passed directly above the witness at high altitude.
Claim #14404 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The analysis shows that the aircraft was in the cruising phase and passed directly above the witness, at a high altitude.”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0002]] Summary
GEIPAN considered it probable that the triangular perception resulted from an erroneous interpretation of the aircraft fuselage and wings.
Claim #14405 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“It is probable that the perception of the triangular shape resulted from an erroneous interpretation of the silhouette of the aircraft’s fuselage and wings.”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0002]] Summary
GEIPAN classified the observation as a Vueling A320 flying from Copenhagen to Barcelona and passing directly over the witness.
Claim #14406 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as “A,” as an observation of an aircraft, a Vueling A320 flying from Copenhagen to Barcelona, passing directly over the witness at the time of the observation.”
Source: CHATTE (38) 14.07.2020
// [[T0002]] Summary
