Reported circular luminous phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge
GEIPAN’s sourced case record describes a reported daytime observation by a witness and other people of a stationary luminous phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge on 13 September 2006 at about 10 a.m. The attributed witness account described it as circular and disappearing along an ascending trajectory after 3–4 minutes. GEIPAN classified the case as B and assessed a small white civilian single-engine aircraft as the highly probable explanation.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case ArchiveEarth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE SOL-3 // FILE 0042 // CH 15 CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT E708-E01B-3C8D MORNING
Reported ascending motionDISK
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
DISK
Above the Iroise Bridge, Brittany, Finistère // Sep 13, 2006 10:00. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINEDMORNINGGEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureWitness, Other people 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported ascending motionStationary for 3–4 minutes, Disappeared along an ascending trajectory
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedSourced GEIPAN case record, Attributed witness testimony
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s)location precision: areaStationary for 3–4 minutesDisappeared along an ascending trajectory
FRED // ROUTING NOTEPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The Visitors did not cause or operate the reported phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge. Your GEIPAN record describes a daytime observation on 13 September 2006: a witness and other people reportedly saw a stationary luminous, circular point for 3–4 minutes before it disappeared upward. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed a small white civilian single-engine aircraft as highly probable, listing “light aircraft.” This is an entirely respectable conclusion. We have no objection to being uninvolved.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record earns its B classification: a brief attributed account of a luminous point, with a small white civilian aircraft assessed as the highly probable explanation. Sensible. The circular shape and upward disappearance remain features of the report, not evidence of extraterrestrial machinery. Also, for the avoidance of interdepartmental panic: this one was not ours. That does not solve the human case; it merely prevents us from being blamed for it. Off the Earth Record, this resembles the sort of filing trouble my cousin Zarnok Vell creates when he treats a restricted observation corridor as an opening suggestion. He apologizes with Sublight Lager and snacks. The paperwork remains several desks wide.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED
Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale
The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment.VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2006-09-13 10:00:00
Where
Above the Iroise Bridge, Brittany, Finistère
Morphology
DISK
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED
Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters
AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.
The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.
What strengthens the record
1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded evidence context: Sourced GEIPAN Case Record and Attributed Witness Testimony.
The source record includes a published resolution: Highly probably a small white civilian single-engine aircraft; listed phenomenon type: light aircraft..
What limits the record
No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.
What would help resolve it
Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?
Fred Says Go Here Next
Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
A witness, together with other people, reportedly observed a stationary luminous phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge for 3 to 4 minutes on September 13, 2006, at 10 a.m.
“On September 13, 2006, at 10 a.m., a witness observed, together with other people, a stationary luminous phenomenon above the Iroise Bridge for 3 to 4 minutes.”
The source states that there was a high probability the witness saw a small aircraft, specifically a white civilian single-engine aircraft that was in the area at the indicated time.
“In view of the response from the maritime region, there is a high probability that the witness saw a small aircraft (a white civilian single-engine aircraft was indeed in this area at the indicated time).”
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.