Earth File #736 // SOURCED record

Observation of three bright red luminous UAPs in Andernos-les-Bains

A sourced GEIPAN case records an observation of three bright red, highly luminous objects moving silently and disappearing behind the landscape in Andernos-les-Bains. GEIPAN classified the case B and concluded that the witnesses had probably observed sky lanterns carried by the wind. Only one of two witnesses submitted testimony, and no photograph or video was taken.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0736 // CH 02
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
EAE5-7975-D3C6
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Andernos-les-Bains // Jun 23, 2018. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturetwo witnesses, one witness submitted testimony to GEIPAN 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoved silently, moved slowly and horizontally in the direction of the wind, disappeared behind the landscape
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness testimony, no photograph or video
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)6 structured claim(s) location precision: locality moved silentlymoved slowly and horizontally in the direction of the winddisappeared behind the landscape
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
We did not cause or operate this reported phenomenon. Your GEIPAN/CNES archive describes three bright red, highly luminous objects moving silently in Andernos-les-Bains on 23 June 2018, then disappearing behind the landscape. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed that sky lanterns carried by the wind were the probable explanation. Only one of two witnesses submitted testimony, and the record says no photograph or video was taken. Our paperwork is clean.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A SOURCED GEIPAN case, sensibly classified B, ends with a probable explanation: sky lanterns carried by the wind. Three red lights moving silently and horizontally in that direction are not exactly an airtight interstellar arrival schedule, particularly when only one witness submitted testimony and no image exists. This one was not ours. That does not solve the human case; it merely prevents me from blaming the family for once. Off the Earth Record: my younger cousin Pip Vell once made an extra low-orbit pass to inspect some lights. He also collected a convenience-store cup and learned why “one extra pass” appears in so many incident reports. Krellians are very committed to avoidable paperwork.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Ionberry Ale

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY IONBERRY ALE // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
June 23, 2018
Where
Andernos-les-Bains
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the structured record explicitly indicates multiple witnesses, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 6 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • The structured witness field explicitly records multiple observers without inventing a headcount.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony and No Photograph Or Video.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Probably sky lanterns carried by the wind; GEIPAN classification B.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Multi-Witness UFO & UAP Reports → Compare how multiple-observer records differ in sourcing and resolution. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #1081

Fixed blue light observed near Toulouse on 2015-02-01

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Two Witnesses.

 Related Earth File #547

Colombes luminous-point observation, 25 July 1979

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Two Witnesses.

 Related Earth File #1264

Bright points observed near Saint-Germain-sur-Ay, explained as aircraft contrails

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #822

Reported moving lights from Rivecourt toward Les Ageux

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #784

Reported luminous point observed from Emanville (27)

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #768

Witness-reported moving multicolored light toward Crozon

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typestwo witnesses, one witness submitted testimony to GEIPAN
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, no photograph or video
The case concerns an observation of three bright red, highly luminous UAPs that moved silently and disappeared behind the landscape; GEIPAN describes sky lanterns carried by the wind as the probable explanation.
Claim #8327 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of the silent movement of three bright red and highly luminous UAPs and their disappearance behind the landscape: probable observation of sky lanterns carried by the wind.”
Source: ANDERNOS-LES-BAINS (33) 23.06.2018 // [[T0001]] Case details — Summary
The observation occurred in Andernos-les-Bains on 2018-06-23 at approximately 11:15–11:30 p.m.
Claim #8328 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The main witness (T1) is on his terrace in Andernos-les-Bains (33) on 23/06/2018 at around 11:15–11:30 p.m.”
Source: ANDERNOS-LES-BAINS (33) 23.06.2018 // [[T0001]] Case details — Description
The investigation concluded that the witnesses had almost certainly observed several sky lanterns passing by.
Claim #8329 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The investigation established that the witnesses had almost certainly observed several sky lanterns passing by (see the investigation report).”
Source: ANDERNOS-LES-BAINS (33) 23.06.2018 // [[T0002]] Case details — Description
The explanation was supported by the reported red color, the number of objects, their slow horizontal movement in the direction of the wind, the Saturday evening timing, the June season, and light wind conditions.
Claim #8330 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The red color is possible, although the color most frequently used for lanterns is orange.”
Source: ANDERNOS-LES-BAINS (33) 23.06.2018 // [[T0002]] Case details — Description
The case is classified B as a probable observation of sky lanterns carried by the wind.
Claim #8331 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The case is classified “B”: probable observation of sky lanterns carried by the wind.”
Source: ANDERNOS-LES-BAINS (33) 23.06.2018 // [[T0003]] Case details — Description
The case had average consistency because only one of the two witnesses submitted testimony to GEIPAN and no photograph or video was taken.
Claim #8332 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Since only one of the two witnesses sent a testimony to GEIPAN and no photograph or video of the UAP was taken, the consistency* of the case is average.”
Source: ANDERNOS-LES-BAINS (33) 23.06.2018 // [[T0002]] Case details — Description
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
ANDERNOS-LES-BAINS (33) 23.06.2018 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod