Earth File #764 // SOURCED record

Reported dark triangle observation over a house in Magny-les-Hameaux

On February 6, 2017, at 7:16 p.m., a witness reportedly observed a slowly moving dark triangle with two white lights above his house for about 30 seconds. A single testimony was collected and no photograph was taken. Radar records identified a low-altitude aircraft at or near the site; GEIPAN classified the case as B, a probable observation of an aircraft.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0764 // CH 05
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
B852-CCFB-718F
EVENING
SENSOR CONTEXT WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionTRIANGLE
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
TRIANGLE
Magny-les-Hameaux // Feb 6, 2017 19:16. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
EXPLAINED EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionslow movement, above a house
Sensor / evidenceradarwitness testimony, radar records
Fred's paperwork completeness9/9 fields // 100%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: locality slow movementabove a house
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMAn interesting report is allowed to have an explanation. This is why the label stays attached to the box even after the mystery gets less glamorous.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The report is accurate in the limited human sense: on February 6, 2017, at 7:16 p.m., a witness in Magny-les-Hameaux observed a dark triangle with two white lights moving slowly above a house for about 30 seconds. GEIPAN assessed it as a probable low-altitude aircraft and classified the case B. Correct. It was ours. The radar cooperation was deliberate; paperwork prefers to call that “no strangeness.”
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A sourced Earth Record, supported by radar records, gives GEIPAN’s restrained verdict: classification B, probable low-altitude aircraft. Sensible. The single testimony and absent photograph leave the visual description limited, while the radar traffic provides a considerably less glamorous explanation than “triangle.” The important distinction is that “unidentified at first glance” is not the same as extraterrestrial; paperwork survives by respecting that difference, unlike several of my relatives. Off the Earth Record: yes, we are taking responsibility. My aunt Vexa Vell borrowed a decommissioned courier pod for what she called a brief Krellian joyride. The navigation lock was allegedly “more of a guideline.” I knew who had borrowed what before she finished blaming Gorkon Blue. Naturally, I was left filing the incident.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2017-02-06 19:16:00
Where
Magny-les-Hameaux
Morphology
TRIANGLE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the record names 1 sensor type, the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report, and visual-media evidence is explicitly referenced. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded sensor context: Radar.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Testimony, Radar Records, and No Photograph.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Probable low-altitude aircraft; GEIPAN classification B.

What limits the record

  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
UFO & UAP Records With Sensor Data → See how other dossiers record sensor context without treating it as automatic corroboration. Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files. UFO & UAP Photo and Video Case Files → Compare provenance and limitations across visual-media cases.
Related Earth File #1327

Carcassonne luminous point observation

Shared sensor context: Radar; shared evidence context: Witness Testimony.

 Related Earth File #1343

Reported luminous yellow triangular object near Joseph le Brix bridge, Bono — explained as the Moon

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1100

Mouans-Sartoux observation of three lights

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #852

Reported triangular object observation near Romilly-sur-Seine

Shared evidence context: No Photograph; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #749

Louviers triangular-light observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1312

Reported luminous cigar-shaped object in Seilhac, identified as flight TO4159

Shared sensor context: Radar; shared evidence context: No Photograph.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesradar
Evidence typeswitness testimony, radar records, no photograph
On February 6, 2017, at 7:16 p.m., a witness standing in front of his garage observed the slow movement of a dark triangle with 2 white lights above his house.
Claim #8643 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“On February 6, 2017, at 7:16 p.m., a witness standing in front of his garage observed the slow movement of a dark triangle with 2 white lights above his house.”
Source: MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
The observation lasted 30 seconds, and the witness did not take a photograph.
Claim #8644 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The observation lasted 30 seconds: not long enough for the witness to take a photograph.”
Source: MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
A single testimony was collected for the case.
Claim #8645 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“A single testimony was collected.”
Source: MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
GEIPAN assessed that the witness probably observed an aircraft at low altitude.
Claim #8646 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness probably observed an aircraft at low altitude.”
Source: MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
Radar records identified movement by an aircraft at low altitude at or near the observation site.
Claim #8647 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“the movement of an aircraft at low altitude is noted at or in the immediate vicinity of the observation site, both in the virtual radar record (Plane Finder) and in the national radar record.”
Source: MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Description paragraph
GEIPAN stated that the aircraft was cooperating with national radars and therefore had no strangeness in the case assessment.
Claim #8648 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“which in any event has no “strangeness” since it was cooperating with the national radars.”
Source: MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 // [[T0002]] Description paragraph
GEIPAN classified the case as B, meaning a probable observation of an aircraft.
Claim #8649 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Consequently, GEIPAN classifies the case as B: probable observation of an aircraft.”
Source: MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 // [[T0002]] Description paragraph
The case record lists the phenomenon type as Aircraft.
Claim #8650 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Aircraft”
Source: MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case record assigns a strangeness value of 0.30 and a consistency value of 0.60.
Claim #8651 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Strangeness 0.30 Consistency 0.60”
Source: MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 // [[T0001]] Case details
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
MAGNY-LES-HAMEAUX (78) 06.02.2017 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod