Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesweather station
Evidence typeswitness report, official GEIPAN investigation, weather records, official case classification
The case observation date was 7 August 2016, and the case was classified as B.
Claim #8908 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date
07/08/2016
Region
Rhône-Alpes
Department
Isère
Classification
B”
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0001]] Case details
The case lists the type of phenomenon as Thai lantern.
Claim #8909 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon
Thai lantern”
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0001]] Case details
The reported observation involved two reddish-orange lights moving silently in the night sky, and the summary identifies them as Thai lanterns.
Claim #8910 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation of the silent movement of 2 reddish-orange lights in the night sky: observation of Thai lanterns.”
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0001]] Summary
The phenomenon was observed from the witness's home garden shortly before 11 p.m. on August 7, 2016, while the witness was watching shooting stars.
Claim #8911 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The phenomenon was observed from the witness's home garden, at the beginning of a summer night, shortly before 11 p.m., on August 7, 2016, while “watching shooting stars.””
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness described a first red/orange light as very bright and oval-shaped, with a second light following it.
Claim #8912 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness reported a “first red/orange light,” “very bright,” of an “oval shape,” flying at an elevation of “45°,” but described by the witness as “rather low.” A “second light follows it.””
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0001]] Description
The two lights reportedly followed one another while slowly undulating, without sound or a trail, and later became smaller before turning toward the southwest according to the witness.
Claim #8913 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“These “two lights follow one another while slowly undulating,” “without sound,” “without a trail,” with an apparent size of “4 cm at arm’s length.” These “two lights became smaller,” and have”
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0001]] Description
The observation lasted a maximum of 30 seconds.
Claim #8914 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The “scene lasted a maximum of 30 seconds.””
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
Weather records from Saint-Etienne-Saint-Geoirs indicated light winds below 10 km/h from the south from 11 p.m. onward on August 7, 2016.
Claim #8916 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 97% extraction confidence
“The weather conditions recorded at Saint-Etienne-Saint-Geoirs (38), approximately 30 km east of the observation site, on August 7, 2016, indicate light winds, below 10 km/h, from the south from 11 p.m. onward (see the Météociel report).”
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN assessed that the report contained characteristic features of Thai lanterns, including reddish-orange color, sequential movement with slow undulation, and absence of sound or trail.
Claim #8917 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This report contains the characteristic features of Thai lanterns: a bright reddish-orange color, moving one after another while slowly undulating, without sound or trail.”
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN assessed that the northwest movement was compatible with the measured wind direction toward the north, considering the distance between the weather station and observation site.
Claim #8918 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The direction of movement (toward the northwest) is compatible with the measured wind direction (toward the north), given that the latter was measured 30 km away.”
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN stated that the Thai-lantern hypothesis was compatible with the observation and among the most plausible explanations.
Claim #8919 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The hypothesis of an observation of lanterns is compatible with the observation and is among the most plausible.”
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0002]] Description
GEIPAN classified the case as B: observation of Thai lanterns.
Claim #8920 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies the case as B: observation of Thai lanterns.”
Source: JARCIEU (38) 07.08.2016
// [[T0003]] Classification conclusion