Earth File #807 // SOURCED record

Peyruis bright glow and loud noise report

A witness reported that a bright glow illuminated a room, followed by a loud noise, lasting approximately one second. The witness later reported burned-grass traces and a circular ground mark; no description of a PAN was available. GEIPAN classified the case as C because of insufficient observation data.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0807 // CH 07
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
0E97-5D9A-B08A
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionLIGHT
FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata
LIGHT
Peyruis // Mar 20, 2016. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureSingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionIlluminated a room, Was followed by a loud noise
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness report, Burned-grass traces
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Illuminated a roomWas followed by a loud noise
FRED // ROUTING NOTEShape and motion give me something worth diagramming. The diagram remains a diagram, which I am apparently required to keep explaining.
Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
The glow reported at Peyruis on 20 March 2016 was ours. A brief room-illumination sequence, followed by the associated noise, completed the operation in approximately one second. Your archive records that the witness later reported burned grass and, separately, a circular ground mark. No shape or position was described, and GEIPAN classified the case C for insufficient observation data. Fair assessment. We had not filed the visual specification with the appropriate terrestrial office.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
A sourced GEIPAN record gives us a one-second glow, a loud noise, later reported traces, and no usable description of any PAN. GEIPAN classified it C: insufficient observation data. Sensible label. A circular mark is interesting; it is not, by itself, a vehicle specification sheet. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. Unfortunately, “us” is not an evidentiary category, and neither is my relatives’ apparent fondness for leaving Earth with a mystery, a scorch mark, and paperwork that makes Gorkon accounting look visionary. The human record establishes an unresolved report, not extraterrestrial involvement. I am merely noting that the responsible department has once again arrived after the incident.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
March 20, 2016
Where
Peyruis
Morphology
LIGHT
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Report, Burned Grass Traces, and Circular Ground Mark.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classification C: insufficient observation data.

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #1217

BAUME-LES-DAMES (25) 17.12.2013 observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #486

Reported bright stationary object observation at Saint-Étienne-de-Cuines

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1270

Saint-Ouen-l'Aumône: reported succession of five white flashes

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1200

Pont-Saint-Pierre (27) — reported observation of up to eight bright white lights

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #857

Didenheim yellow luminous point observation

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #789

Jarcieu: two reddish-orange lights identified as Thai lanterns

Shared evidence context: Witness Report; similar witness context: Single Witness.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesSingle witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness report, Burned-grass traces, Circular ground mark
The case observation date was 20 March 2016.
Claim #9066 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Observation date 20/03/2016”
Source: PEYRUIS (04) 20.03.2016 // [[T0001]]
The witness reported that a bright glow illuminated the room, followed by a loud noise, and that traces of burned grass were subsequently observed in a neighbor's field.
Claim #9067 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness is in bed when a bright glow illuminates the room, followed by a loud noise. Subsequently, the witness observes traces of burned grass in a neighbor's field.”
Source: PEYRUIS (04) 20.03.2016 // [[T0001]]
No other testimony was collected, and the observation lasted approximately one second.
Claim #9068 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“No other testimony is collected. The observation is extremely brief (1 second)”
Source: PEYRUIS (04) 20.03.2016 // [[T0001]]
The witness did not leave the house and could not provide a description of a PAN, including its possible shape or position.
Claim #9069 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“The witness did not leave the house and therefore cannot provide a description of a PAN (Unidentified Aerospace Phenomenon), including any possible shape, position, etc.”
Source: PEYRUIS (04) 20.03.2016 // [[T0001]]
The witness found a circular mark in the ground the following day.
Claim #9071 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Furthermore, the witness found a circular mark in the ground the following day.”
Source: PEYRUIS (04) 20.03.2016 // [[T0002]]
GEIPAN classifies the case as C because of insufficient observation data.
Claim #9072 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Consequently, GEIPAN classifies the case as C: insufficient observation data.”
Source: PEYRUIS (04) 20.03.2016 // [[T0002]]
The case's listed type of phenomenon is "Lack of reliable information."
Claim #9073 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 100% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Lack of reliable information”
Source: PEYRUIS (04) 20.03.2016 // [[T0001]]
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
PEYRUIS (04) 20.03.2016 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod