Earth File #844 // SOURCED record

Reported translucent triangular phenomenon over Salon-de-Provence

A witness reportedly observed a translucent, possibly hollow triangular shape moving rapidly from southwest to northeast across several tens of degrees in approximately one second on August 6, 2015, at 10:20 p.m. The witness reported no sound, flashing, or trail. GEIPAN considered simultaneous shooting stars during the Perseid shower as a possible explanation, but it was not confirmed and did not adequately explain the reported shape; the case was classified C for insufficient information and corroboration.

Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial

FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0844 // CH 12
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA

CASE FINGERPRINT
6E31-A292-F1E8
NIGHT

Reported rapid motionTRIANGLE

FRED // ROUTING NOTE // generated from Earth Record metadata

TRIANGLE

Salon-de-Provence (13) // Aug 6, 2015 22:20. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.

UNRESOLVED NIGHT GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive

Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate

Motion traceReported rapid motionrapid movement, traveled from southwest to northeast, crossed several tens of degrees in approximately one second

Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedwitness report, official scientific investigation

Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%

Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability

1 document(s)1 source node(s)13 structured claim(s) location precision: locality rapid movementtraveled from southwest to northeastcrossed several tens of degrees in approximately one second

FRED // ROUTING NOTEThe drawer stays open. That is not permission to write ALIENS on the tab in permanent marker.

Off-record desk banter // not case attribution
Mivra Qel would call this display “plenty of information.” Mivra Qel also has never encountered a restricted corridor she considered personally binding. His visualization standards are not binding on this desk.

Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence

Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer

Yes. That was ours: a translucent triangular transit over Salon-de-Provence, completed with our usual preference for minimal noise and no paperwork at the point of operation. Your GEIPAN/CNES record reports a single witness seeing it cross the sky in approximately one second, with no sound, flashing, or trail. The record also notes that simultaneous shooting stars were considered but not confirmed, and that the hollow shape remained unexplained. Classification C. Acceptable filing, by human standards.

Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer

GEIPAN’s Earth Record is admirably restrained: a brief, single-witness observation, a possible Perseid explanation, and a C classification because the information and corroboration do not settle the matter. The triangular shape remains poorly accounted for. Sensible filing, at last—though “unresolved” is not the same as “extraterrestrial,” a distinction humans keep placing in the wrong drawer. Off the Earth Record, AlienBox accepts responsibility. Yes, yes, you finally noticed us. The luminous geometry was ours; the paperwork, regrettably, was not. I have requested the responsible department stop submitting one-second field demonstrations as ambiguous sky phenomena. They say this is “a matter of perspective,” which is precisely why I dislike dealing with relatives.

FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Quasar Foam

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY QUASAR FOAM // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC

QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address

DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s

OPEN DGB WALLET →

Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending

SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →

When

2015-08-06 22:20:00

Where

Salon-de-Provence (13)

Morphology

TRIANGLE

Evidence authority

SOURCED

Resolution

UNRESOLVED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade

Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
13 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
Recorded evidence context: Witness Report, Official Scientific Investigation, and Astronomical Check.
The source record includes a published resolution: A simultaneous-shooting-stars explanation was considered but could not be confirmed and did not adequately explain the reported ho....

What limits the record

No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.

Witness typessingle witness

Sensor typesNot stated

Evidence typeswitness report, official scientific investigation, astronomical check

The observation lasted one second and involved the rapid movement of a translucent triangular shape in the sky.

Claim #9426 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“Observation lasting one second of the rapid movement of a translucent triangular shape in the sky: lack of information and corroboration.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0001]] Case details, Summary

On August 6, 2015, at 10:20 p.m., a witness noticed the rapid passage of a translucent triangular shape in the sky.

Claim #9427 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“On August 6, 2015, at 10:20 p.m., a witness noticed the rapid passage of a translucent triangular shape in the sky, which intrigued them.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0001]] Description

The witness reported no sound, flashing, or trail, and only one report was collected.

Claim #9428 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“No sound, flashing, or trail was noticed. A single report was collected.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0001]] Description

The witness reported that the phenomenon moved from southwest to northeast across several tens of degrees in one second.

Claim #9429 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“The witness observed the phenomenon moving from southwest to northeast across several tens of degrees in one second.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0001]] Description

An astronomical check indicated that the International Space Station passed from 10:20 p.m. to 10:25 p.m., from west to east, at low elevation, but was far from the direction in which the witness was looking.

Claim #9430 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence

“(ISS) from 10:20 p.m. to 10:25 p.m., from west to east, at low elevation, simultaneously with the observation but quite far from the direction in which the witness was looking; lying down, the witness was looking toward the zenith.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0002]] Description

The rapidity of the phenomenon and its coincidence with the Perseid meteor shower led toward a hypothesis of three simultaneous shooting stars, possibly originating from the same body.

Claim #9431 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence

“The rapidity of the phenomenon, and the coincidence with the observation period of the Perseid meteor shower (shooting stars), point toward a hypothesis of three simultaneous shooting stars (perhaps originating from the same body).”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0002]] Description

The simultaneous-shooting-stars hypothesis did not adequately explain the hollow triangular shape reported by the witness.

Claim #9432 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“This hypothesis, of course, does not adequately explain the hollow triangular shape observed by the witness.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0002]] Description

The possible explanation involving simultaneous shooting stars could not be confirmed.

Claim #9433 // UNRESOLVED // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“But this hypothesis cannot be confirmed.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0002]] Description

When questioned by telephone, the witness said that the brightness of the luminous points did not resemble that of a shooting star.

Claim #9434 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“When questioned by telephone, the witness specified that the brightness of the luminous points did not resemble that of a shooting star.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0002]] Description

The very short observation by a single witness did not permit detailed characterization of the phenomenon.

Claim #9435 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“The very short observation, by a single witness, does not make it possible to characterize the phenomenon in detail.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0002]] Description

GEIPAN classified the case as C because of a lack of information and corroboration.

Claim #9436 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“GEIPAN classifies this case as “C” due to a lack of information and corroboration.”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0002]] Description

The case record lists the phenomenon type as “Lack of reliable information.”

Claim #9437 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“Phenomenon type Lack of reliable information”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0001]] Case details

The case record lists the classification as C.

Claim #9438 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence

“Classification C”

Source: SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // [[T0001]] Case details

FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Related Cases

SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 // INCIDENT

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.

SALON-DE-PROVENCE (13) 06.08.2015 FR // English display translation

ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS

Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.

Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.

HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.