Earth File #871 // SOURCED record

Reported six-light circular phenomenon over Issy-les-Moulineaux

The GEIPAN case record reports that a single witness observed a dark phenomenon composed of six lights arranged in a circle at 7:58 p.m. The account was brief and lacked precise geographical reference points, a drawing, or a photograph. GEIPAN classified the case as C because of insufficient information about the testimony and air traffic; aircraft or helicopter lights were mentioned as possible explanations.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0871 // CH 10
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
B54E-E987-27B0
EVENING
? WITNESS CONTEXT
Motion not statedOTHER
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
OTHER
Issy-les-Moulineaux, Île-de-France, Hauts-de-Seine // May 25, 2015 19:58. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA EVENING GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness picturesingle witness 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceMotion not statedNo behavior field was stated in the structured record.
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedsingle testimony
Fred's paperwork completeness7/9 fields // 78%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)7 structured claim(s) location precision: locality
FRED // QUICK TAKENo source image, thin visual metadata, and therefore no decorative radar pretending it learned something. You are welcome.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes, that was ours. At 7:58 p.m. on 25 May 2015, one witness in Issy-les-Moulineaux reported a dark phenomenon with six lights arranged in a circle. The GEIPAN record classifies the case C: the account was brief, the reference points imprecise, and the record reports no drawing or photograph. Aircraft or helicopter lights were mentioned as possible explanations. Fair assessment. We had filed the flight plan under “miscellaneous.”
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced record describes one brief observation: six lights arranged in a circle, with no drawing, photograph, precise reference points, or useful air-traffic detail. Classification C is therefore the correct bureaucratic label—not a secret code for “Fred knows what it was.” Aircraft or helicopter lights remain possible explanations, and the record does not resolve the matter. Off the Earth Record: yes, yes. You finally noticed us. Responsibility is accepted on behalf of the Visitors, though I should stress that our admission does not upgrade a thin human file into Earth evidence. Someone in my extended family has once again turned a routine transit into an interdepartmental mystery, and I am left with the paperwork.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
QR code for Fred's DigiByte tip address
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
2015-05-25 19:58:00
Where
Issy-les-Moulineaux, Île-de-France, Hauts-de-Seine
Morphology
OTHER
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 7 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Single Testimony.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: GEIPAN classification C; aircraft or helicopter lights were mentioned as possible explanations, but the case lacked sufficient inf....

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.
Resolved UFO & UAP Case Files → Compare published explanations across resolved case files.
Related Earth File #676

A750: Multiple Yellow Lights Observed from Aumelas toward Gignac

Shared evidence context: Single Testimony; similar witness context: Single Witness.

 Related Earth File #1227

Thueyts (07) observation — 8 November 2013

Similar witness context: Single Witness; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1226

Laragne-Monteglin multicolored light observation

Similar witness context: Single Witness; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1185

OSNY observation, 15 March 2014

Similar witness context: Single Witness; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #1174

Reported observation of four white circles near Saint-Hilaire-de-Brethmas

Similar witness context: Single Witness; same recorded morphology.

 Related Earth File #724

ARON (53) 28.03.2019 reported observation

Similar witness context: Single Witness; same recorded morphology.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typessingle testimony
The case record concerns an observation in Issy-les-Moulineaux on 25 May 2015, in the Ile-de-France region and Hauts-de-Seine department.
Claim #9691 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX (92) 25.05.2015 Observation date 25/05/2015 Region Ile-de-France Department Hauts-de-Seine”
Source: ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX (92) 25.05.2015 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case was classified as C.
Claim #9692 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification C”
Source: ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX (92) 25.05.2015 // [[T0001]] Case details
At 7:58 p.m. on May 25, 2015, a witness observed a dark phenomenon in the sky composed of six lights in a circle.
Claim #9693 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On May 25, 2015, at 7:58 p.m., a witness observed a dark phenomenon in the sky composed of 6 lights in a circle.”
Source: ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX (92) 25.05.2015 // [[T0001]] Description
A single testimony was collected, and the observation report was particularly succinct, with imprecise geographical reference points, a very brief account, and no drawing or photograph.
Claim #9694 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“A single testimony was collected. This observation report is particularly succinct, the geographical reference points are imprecise, the account is very brief, and there is no drawing or photograph.”
Source: ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX (92) 25.05.2015 // [[T0001]] Description
The circular shape described by the witness may have been only the abstract outline of the six observed lights rather than a necessarily real circular object or shape.
Claim #9695 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 94% extraction confidence
“The circular shape described by the witness is not necessarily real; it may be only the abstract outline of the 6 observed lights.”
Source: ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX (92) 25.05.2015 // [[T0001]] Description
The lights may have belonged to an airplane or helicopter, and a heliport was very close.
Claim #9696 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 93% extraction confidence
“These lights may have been those of an airplane or a helicopter (a heliport is very close).”
Source: ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX (92) 25.05.2015 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN classified the case as C because of a lack of information and details about the testimony and air traffic.
Claim #9697 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“In the absence of details about the testimony and air traffic, GEIPAN classifies this case as “C” due to a lack of information and details.”
Source: ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX (92) 25.05.2015 // [[T0002]] Classification explanation
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
ISSY-LES-MOULINEAUX (92) 25.05.2015 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.
Earth ArchiveSourcesMethod